Both Wrong

It's hilarious when Bill O'Reilly says the New York Times is in trouble because it's too liberal. And it's hilarious when Russell Baker says the Washington Post is in trouble because it's not liberal enough.

(To read the Baker article, you'll have to subscribe to the "New York Review of Books," which still seems to be pretty fat and sassy, and for reasons that probably have nothing to do with ideology. My guess is it's because it doesn't give its content away and its advertisers, book publishers, will be the last industry to abandon print.)