tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5668712602334003954.post3813216334785643556..comments2024-01-12T15:32:22.236-08:00Comments on The Episconixonian: Ratings Death PanelsFr. Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09974142521713230215noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5668712602334003954.post-50493687477300019752010-11-18T19:44:11.029-08:002010-11-18T19:44:11.029-08:00With a panel that good, the politicians would be e...With a panel that good, the politicians would be extraneous!Fr. Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09974142521713230215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5668712602334003954.post-31337858824370890792010-11-17T19:43:33.563-08:002010-11-17T19:43:33.563-08:00Don't really agree with you or Hugh (ha ha) on...Don't really agree with you or Hugh (ha ha) on this, John. He's right that the same old closet lefty journalists ask loaded questions that beg politic answers rather than really drawing out candidates or discussion, but the folks he suggests are equally (if more openly) biased, and will have the same effect. I'd go for his idea with some modification - create a truly balanced panel such as:<br />Right wing advocate - Rush or some such<br />Left wing nutball - Krugman or Dowd<br />Pseudo-Conservative - Frum or Brooks<br />Libertarian - John Stossel<br /><br />Now that would make for a nice range, wouldn't it, although with a "Republican" bent? But it will never happen on stealth-left network TV.Paul Eskildsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01343458727094778031noreply@blogger.com